Page 1 of 1

Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:00 am
by Solourus
Instead of having 3 set difficulty levels, would it be possible to code in more customisable difficulty settings? Or even in addition too.

For example at the start of the game a player could be given three settings.

1. Scrap avaliability (low/medium/high)
2. Opponent difficulty(easy/moderate/hard)
3. Allow Pausing in combat (yes/no)

I could easily imagine more settings that could be tweeked (eg perhaps an option to randomise the end boss).

Disclamer: I have (yet) to actualy play the game

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:05 am
by Gorlom
Solourus wrote:Instead of having 3 set difficulty levels, would it be possible to code in more customisable difficulty settings? Or even in addition too.

For example at the start of the game a player could be given three settings.

1. Scrap avaliability (low/medium/high)
2. Opponent difficulty(easy/moderate/hard)
3. Allow Pausing in combat (yes/no)

I could easily imagine more settings that could be tweeked (eg perhaps an option to randomise the end boss).

Disclamer: I have (yet) to actualy play the game
1. There is no hard difficulty. only easy and normal... normal being very difficult. It's kinda sending a message that "this is a roguelike. You shouldn't be able to finish the game every run"
2. If you couldn't pause in combat the game probably would be impossible... or at least stop being fun. It's such an integrated part of their game model that I don't think it can be removed.

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:26 pm
by lordboy54
Pausing should ALWAYS be allowed, no option for that in my opinion.

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:51 pm
by Paul
I can't claim expertise, having only played the onlive demo and only kickstarted enough for the full game, but I found I didn't pause that much. I guess it's individual play style- and the game has evolved so much since then....

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:51 pm
by Snake Plissken
I like the "no pause" as being an option. It could act like a multiplier to your final score. Nothing says you NEED to use the setting. Just one more thing to make it appeal to the masses without taking anything away from the game.

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:30 pm
by Paul
The only thing "no pause" would do is prove the speed at which somebody would accurately click at, and think, rather than skill, though. watching some of darthcaboose's stream today I realized that power switching needs to be a lot quicker than I could do it without pause; also, is the speed of the game designed to simulate real time 1:1? I'd have expected the game is running faster than that anyway, if you know what I mean.

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:09 pm
by Snake Plissken
So your argument is that you don't see how doing things quickly and accuratly while at the same time problem solving is a skill or difficult?

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:21 pm
by Gorlom
Snake Plissken wrote:So your argument is that you don't see how doing things quickly and accuratly while at the same time problem solving is a skill or difficult?
I think his argument is that it would be fake difficulty. Subcategory number 1.

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:27 pm
by zabbo2
I like all of Solourus suggestions. I have always been a fan of difficulty modifiers like this, and especially when they have attached score modifiers. For a game like this one, getting a big final score actually means something...and it would give the game longevity and more possibilities for improving your score if you could take on certain handicaps.

I think the no pause option would be a lot more fun. Certainly it would be more difficult, which is great. But it would make battles way more frantic and like actual battles, where you can't micromanage everything. I don't think this would be for everyone but considering it is just disabling a game feature I imagine it would not be that hard to do programming-wise. I suppose you could even just not have the option in-game and instead just not pause if you wanted to play that way, but the bragging rights would be more difficult to justify :)

Re: Difficulty suggestion

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:55 pm
by Paul
I think the no-pause should be an option, but with no score multiplier- it's a different skill, managing the best (with pausing) or managing the fastest (with pausing). And there's something cool about frantically smashing the keyboard to power up shields before that laser fires. if it's possible to have a second leader-board, that could be an option.

Another thought to adjust the difficulty is "realistic oxygen" as soon as a door was opened or a hull breach, that room would be emptied of oxygen. This would obviously make breach missiles more valuable/dangerous, and change some people's tactics for boarders.